While sorting diamonds, it unexpectedly turned into a lesson on psychology, sociology, and the way we perceive value.

We place the highest value on diamonds with the least visible inclusions — yet those very inclusions are what make each diamond unique.

An interesting irony.

In hiring, leadership, and even social acceptance, do we truly value people for what makes them different? Or do we subconsciously choose those who fit predefined molds because familiarity feels safer?

Some of the most remarkable individuals I’ve met — in business and in life — carried “inclusions” of their own. The very things that may not fit perfectly on paper are often what make them irreplaceable.

What Do You Think?

Does being unique truly create value, or does being “common” increase the chances of being chosen?